OWASP Top 10 For Flutter – M3: Insecure Authentication and Authorization in Flutter
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Welcome back to our series on the OWASP Mobile Top 10 for Flutter developers. We’ve already explored and . Now, we dive into M3: Insecure Authentication and Authorization, a classic yet devastating threat that can quietly unravel even the most polished Flutter apps.In this post, we’ll explain the difference between these two core security pillars and explore how they are implemented (or misimplemented) in Flutter apps while weaving in guidance from OWASP’s Mobile Application Security Verification Standard () and real-world attack models
When building a Flutter app, it's easy to get excited about crafting beautiful interfaces and smooth animations. But beneath the surface of those seamless user experiences lies something far more critical: authentication and authorization. These two processes aren't just technical terminology; they're the protection of your users' identities and the gatekeepers of your data.Authentication ensures users are genuinely who they claim to be, while authorization determines precisely what each authenticated user can and cannot do within your app. Think of authentication as checking IDs at the front door and authorization as ensuring guests don't wander into restricted rooms once inside.
But what happens when these essential controls are weak or poorly implemented? Unfortunately, the consequences are severe and all too common:
Malicious users can effortlessly impersonate others, assuming their identities to access sensitive information.
Attackers may elevate their privileges, gaining admin-like power to manipulate your app in ways never intended.
Confidential user data—from financial details to private messages—could become open to unauthorized eyes.
Unsecured transactions could lead to fraudulent actions without the user's knowledge or consent.
Worst of all, critical administrative operations could fall into malicious hands, allowing attackers to disrupt or damage your entire system.
Flutter apps, despite their convenience and rapid development cycles, often fall victim to these vulnerabilities because developers may inadvertently make mistakes like:
Storing authentication tokens insecurely makes them easy prey on compromised devices.
Relying solely on local checks, believing users won’t reverse-engineer or manipulate local logic.
Neglecting strong, consistent server-side verification, thus leaving gaps that attackers can exploit.
Placing blind trust in user-supplied data for permissions and roles, making privilege escalation trivial.
Adding fuel to the fire, mobile apps frequently require offline functionality, leading developers to handle authentication and authorization locally. This is convenient but also risky. Attackers have near-total control over rooted or jailbroken devices, meaning client-side security alone isn't enough.
Let me show you a typical authorization flow in Flutter:
We will go to each part of this in the following sections. Let's explore.
To put these threats into perspective, OWASP classifies insecure authentication and authorization (M3) as one of the most critical issues facing mobile apps. Attackers targeting M3 vulnerabilities often use automated tools, custom scripts, or malicious software on rooted devices. They bypass client-side protections by directly communicating with backend services, forging user roles, or exploiting hidden API endpoints.For Flutter developers, understanding this bigger picture means recognizing that threats aren't theoretical; they’re driven by real attackers who exploit predictable patterns like weak credential policies, insecure token storage, or insufficient server-side checks. Ignoring these security measures doesn't just risk your data; it can lead to severe legal, financial, and reputational damage.By fully grasping the OWASP threat model, you'll build stronger, more resilient authentication and authorization systems, protecting your Flutter applications from common yet devastating attacks.
While client-side validation is essential for enhancing user experience and catching errors early, it cannot be trusted as the sole line of defense. Client-side checks can be bypassed, manipulated, or entirely disabled by attackers using reverse engineering techniques or network interception. This is why server-side validation is non-negotiable when it comes to securing your Flutter app.
Bypass Vulnerabilities: Attackers can modify client-side code or intercept requests, rendering any client-side validation ineffective. Server-side checks ensure that every request is verified on a trusted environment.
Consistent Enforcement: Server-side validation provides a centralized enforcement point for critical security rules, such as strong password policies, token verification, and role-based access controls. This reduces inconsistencies that might arise when multiple clients handle validation.
Mitigation of Automated Attacks: With server-side mechanisms like rate limiting, account lockouts, and detailed logging, you can better detect and mitigate brute-force or credential stuffing attacks that bypass client-side measures.
Secure Sensitive Operations: Operations involving sensitive data or administrative functions must always be validated on the server to prevent unauthorized access, even if the user interface hides certain options.
Enforce Data Integrity: Always verify user input, tokens, and permissions on the server, regardless of the client-side checks performed.
Utilize Secure Tokens: Implement short-lived access tokens and robust refresh mechanisms. Validate these tokens on every request to ensure that the session remains secure.
Role and Permission Checks: Never trust client-supplied data for critical decisions like role assignments. Use server-side logic to confirm the user's privileges before executing any sensitive operation.
Centralized Logging and Monitoring: Incorporate logging of all critical actions and validation failures. This centralized logging not only helps in early detection of suspicious activities but also aids in post-incident analysis.
Remember: The principle of "defense in depth" means that every layer of your app, from the client to the server, must work together to ensure robust security.
Let’s walk through these common pitfalls together, exploring what typically goes wrong and how easily attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities. We’ll then examine robust solutions so you can confidently protect your apps from these risks.
One of the simplest yet most overlooked vulnerabilities is weak password enforcement. At first glance, handling password inputs might seem straightforward. You create a simple registration form in Flutter, add a password field, and ensure users can't leave it blank. Your form might look something like this:
This snippet feels harmless; after all, you're verifying that users at least provide something. But consider this: attackers armed with automated tools can attempt thousands of common passwords in just a few minutes. With no complexity checks, no minimum-length enforcement, and no server-side protection, you've unintentionally provided them with a golden opportunity.Attackers thrive in these environments, efficiently bypassing client-side validations or intercepting requests to test countless weak passwords, such as "123456," "password," or "qwerty."
Why Does This Happen So Often?
Flutter developers sometimes mistakenly assume client-side validation is sufficient. However, attackers can effortlessly bypass local validation by manipulating the app or intercepting network requests.
As detailed in our 'Server-Side Validation' section, client-side password checks are only the first line of defense.
Weak passwords or predictable patterns make credential stuffing and brute-force attacks effective and widespread.
How to Secure Password Handling
Implementing strong password security is straightforward, but it requires diligence and consistent enforcement:
Always validate passwords on the backend rather than relying on client-side checks alone.
Enforce complexity rules:
Require passwords to be at least 8–12 characters.
Mandate a mix of uppercase letters, lowercase letters, numbers, and special characters.
Protect against automated attacks using rate limiting, account lockouts, or progressive delays after multiple failed login attempts.
We have talked about this in previous articles, too.Think of authentication tokens as master keys that open doors to your application’s sensitive areas. When users log in, your Flutter app typically receives a token, often a JWT, that proves their identity for future interactions. But what happens if these critical tokens aren't stored securely?Imagine you decide to store tokens using Flutter’s convenient SharedPreferences:
Looks simple, right? Unfortunately, convenience here comes with significant risk. On a rooted Android device, an attacker can easily navigate to:
There, your neatly stored tokens sit completely unencrypted, like spare house keys under a welcome mat. Attackers won't even need specialized tools—these tokens are accessible and readable in plain text, ready for misuse.
Why Does This Happen?
Flutter’s SharedPreferences is great for quickly storing user preferences, but it's never meant to handle sensitive data.
Remember, as highlighted in our 'Server-Side Validation' section, local storage should never be the only safeguard.
Developers often favor convenience and session persistence without fully recognizing the security implications.
Why Does This Happen?
Flutter’s SharedPreferences is great for quickly storing user preferences, but it's never meant to handle sensitive data.
Remember, as highlighted in our 'Server-Side Validation' section, local storage should never be the only safeguard.
Developers often favor convenience and session persistence without fully recognizing the security implications.
How to Securely Store Tokens
Fortunately, Flutter offers safer alternatives designed specifically for sensitive data. The best practice is to use flutter_secure_storage, which leverages Android's hardware-backed Keystore and iOS's secure Keychain. Here's how easily you can implement this:
Passwords alone are rarely strong enough, especially in mobile apps where convenience wins out over robust security. Users commonly select easy-to-remember passwords or reuse them across multiple platforms, dramatically increasing the risk of compromise. If your Flutter app relies solely on passwords, you leave a single weak point between your users and attackers.Imagine a banking app built in Flutter that requires only a username and password to log in, no OTP verification, no biometric checks, and nothing additional. If those credentials get leaked (and often do), an attacker can stroll through your security.
Why Does This Happen?
Passwords are easily compromised: Users frequently reuse them across sites, increasing the likelihood of being exposed to a breach.
Phishing and social engineering: Attackers constantly attempt to trick users into giving away credentials.
SIM-swap attacks: Even if SMS-based MFA is used, attackers might intercept messages, making simple SMS-based verification inadequate.
Without MFA, every leaked or phished password represents an immediate risk of complete account takeover.
Best Practices for Implementing MFA
Implementing Multi-Factor Authentication is the most effective way to protect your users and your app. MFA provides additional security layers beyond the password, significantly limiting damage from leaked credentials.Here’s how you can integrate robust MFA into your Flutter apps:
TOTP-based authentication: Use authenticator apps (like Google Authenticator or Authy) to generate unique, time-limited codes for each login.
Push-based notifications: Prompt users to approve logins through notifications on their trusted devices.
Biometric authentication: Utilize fingerprints or facial recognition as a secure fallback, especially for sensitive actions.
Implementing MFA using trusted third-party providers or custom backend logic dramatically enhances your security posture. It ensures that even if passwords are compromised, attackers face substantial barriers preventing unauthorized access.
Biometric authentication, like fingerprints or facial recognition, offers impressive convenience and is often perceived as highly secure. However, when biometrics are misused or incorrectly implemented, they can create a dangerous illusion of security.Consider a Flutter-based note-taking app that secures sensitive notes with a fingerprint scan, utilizing Flutter’s local_auth package.The implementation might look something like this:
This seems robust, right? Unfortunately, because this check occurs entirely on the client side, it's vulnerable to manipulation. An attacker with access to a rooted device can easily bypass or entirely fake the biometric verification by modifying the app, granting themselves unrestricted access to protected notes.
Why Does This Happen?
Purely local checks: Without verifying biometric success on the server-side, the local-only validation can easily be bypassed.
No secure fallback: The absence of an alternative verification (like a PIN or password) leaves your app vulnerable if biometrics are compromised or unsupported.
Missing session-based validation: If biometrics directly unlock sensitive content without validating sessions or tokens, the security of your data depends entirely on local security.
Best Practices for Secure Biometric Integration
To leverage biometrics safely in your Flutter applications:
Use biometrics to unlock securely stored tokens, not directly to grant immediate data access.
As outlined in our 'Server-Side Validation' section, biometrics should only serve as an initial step to unlock secure tokens. Always combine them with server-side validations to prevent bypass attempts.
Provide secure fallback methods (such as PIN or password) for devices without biometric support or in cases of biometric failure.
Following these guidelines will significantly enhance security, transforming biometrics from a misleading comfort to a genuinely robust protective measure.
Session management is the quiet guardian behind your app's security. Unfortunately, it's often overlooked—leading to tokens that never expire, missing logout functionality, and the absence of proper token-refresh logic. Such oversights can severely weaken your app’s security posture.Imagine a Flutter app designed to keep users conveniently logged in indefinitely.On the surface, users might appreciate the seamless experience. But what if their device gets lost, stolen, or compromised? Without a proper timeout or refresh strategy, the attacker instantly inherits an endless session, gaining continuous access to sensitive user data.
Why Does This Happen?
Long-lived tokens: Tokens with no expiration date or excessively long lifetimes significantly increase risk if they're ever compromised.
Lack of automatic mitigation: Without token expiration, there's no built-in mechanism to reduce damage or automatically revoke access.
Simplified session hijacking: Attackers find it easier to hijack sessions when tokens never expire or there is no effective logout procedure.
Best Practices for Secure Session Management
To protect your users and secure their sessions effectively:
Issue short-lived access tokens (typically around 15 minutes), significantly reducing the exposure window if compromised.
Utilize secure refresh tokens, stored safely using flutter_secure_storage, to renew access seamlessly yet securely.
Consistently implement a robust logout mechanism that clears tokens both locally and server-side, ensuring no lingering sessions remain active after logout.
Store all session tokens securely, leveraging encrypted local storage mechanisms like flutter_secure_storage.
Sometimes, the most dangerous vulnerabilities are the ones you didn't even realize existed. It's easy to assume that if a feature isn't visible or directly accessible from your app’s UI, users won't find or exploit it—but attackers frequently prove this assumption wrong.
Consider this real-world scenario: A Flutter-based health application had an internal testing endpoint at /test-patient-info. It was designed to simplify QA processes by quickly fetching sensitive patient data. Unfortunately, developers forgot to secure this endpoint properly before launching to production:
Without requiring an authentication token or performing authorization checks, this seemingly hidden endpoint quietly exposed sensitive patient information to anyone who knew where to look.
Why Does This Happen?
Developers mistakenly assume that users will never discover or exploit specific endpoints, particularly those meant for internal QA or debugging.
Forgotten test routes remain active, silently waiting to be exploited in production.
UI-level gating, such as hiding buttons or options from the user interface, is incorrectly treated as adequate security, even though attackers frequently bypass client-side controls.
Best Practices for Securing All Endpoints
To prevent attackers from exploiting hidden or forgotten endpoints:
As discussed in our 'Server-Side Validation' section, relying solely on client-side restrictions, like hiding endpoints, is risky.
Conduct a thorough audit of all available routes and endpoints before releasing your app to production.
Remove or fully disable test or debug endpoints in your release builds, minimizing unnecessary attack surfaces.
Unfortunately, many Flutter developers fall into common authorization pitfalls even when authentication is done right. A frequent misconception is that if an option or endpoint is hidden from the UI, users won't find or misuse it.This assumption fails to recognize how easily attackers can reverse-engineer apps or intercept network calls to uncover hidden endpoints or functionalities.Let’s explore some of the most prevalent authorization mistakes Flutter apps encounter, understanding what goes wrong, why these issues arise, and, most importantly, how to avoid them.
Imagine you're building a Flutter-based social media app where each user creates and views their posts. To load a specific post, you might write a straightforward function like this:
At first glance, everything seems fine. After all, the user is authenticated. However, consider what happens if your backend only verifies that the user is logged in but doesn't verify if the post belongs to that user. Attackers can exploit this weakness easily by guessing or incrementing the post IDs to access other users' posts:
If these identifiers (1024, 1025, 1026) are sequential or easily predictable, you've unintentionally allowed attackers to access sensitive content belonging to other users. This is precisely what's known as Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), also called Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR), which is one of the most commonly exploited vulnerabilities in APIs today.
To prevent BOLA vulnerabilities effectively, you should implement the following best practices clearly and consistently:
1. Always Verify Resource Ownership Server-Side
When handling requests for specific resources, your backend must ensure the user requesting the resource owns or has permission to access it.
2. Use UUIDs or Non-Predictable Identifiers
Instead of using sequential numbers (like 1024, 1025, etc.), use universally unique identifiers (UUIDs). UUIDs make it virtually impossible for attackers to guess or enumerate resource identifiers.For example, your API endpoint might look like this:
You can easily generate UUIDs in Dart with the uuid package:
Your backend would store and reference these UUIDs, significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized access via ID enumeration.
3. Never Rely on Client-Side Authorization
It's tempting to rely on UI-level logic to hide options or functionalities a user shouldn’t access. However, attackers can bypass the client side entirely. Server-side checks must always be your ultimate line of defense.
Suppose you’re building an admin dashboard in your Flutter application. You carefully design the UI so that regular users don’t see sensitive actions like "Delete User," reserving this functionality exclusively for administrators.In your frontend, you have something like:
You might feel confident after all, regular users can't see or interact with this button, right? Unfortunately, attackers don't need a visible button to exploit your app.They can directly call your API endpoint with crafted requests, completely bypassing UI restrictions:
If your server-side logic lacks a robust check verifying user privileges, a non-admin user can effortlessly execute administrative actions like deleting users—this vulnerability is known as Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA).
Why Does This Happen?
Developers mistakenly assume UI-level restrictions are sufficient protection.
Server-side checks for user roles or permissions are either weak or missing entirely.
Attackers can easily discover and craft API requests manually—even hidden endpoints are discoverable through reverse engineering or network analysis.
How to Secure Your Flutter App Against BFLA
Here are proven approaches to ensure your application properly validates user privileges and permissions:
1. Implement Strict Role-Based Checks on the Server
Always enforce access control logic on your backend, validating explicitly whether the user making the request has the correct privileges:
This example ensures that only an authenticated user with an admin role can perform the delete operation.
2. Validate Roles Using Secure Tokens (JWT Claims)
Use JSON Web Tokens (JWT) to encode roles and permissions securely, allowing the server to validate these details without relying on client-supplied data:
When processing requests, the server must decode and verify the JWT claims thoroughly before allowing privileged actions.
3. Log and Monitor Abnormal Access Attempts
Ensure your backend actively logs all attempts—especially unsuccessful ones—to perform sensitive actions. Implement monitoring and alerts for suspicious behavior indicating potential attempts at privilege escalation:
A common pitfall among Flutter developers is mistakenly placing trust in data controlled by clients, particularly roles and permissions. Imagine your app stores a user's role locally and includes it in request headers.Your backend API might initially look like this:
An attacker quickly realizes that changing this header from role: "user" to role: "admin" grants unrestricted administrative access:
In line with our 'Server-Side Validation' best practices, never trust client-supplied role data. Always verify roles and permissions on the backend to ensure proper authorization.
Why Does This Happen?
Developers sometimes incorrectly assume clients will behave honestly, trusting user-controlled data such as request headers or local state.
The backend lacks robust verification of user roles or permissions.
Client-side roles, stored locally or sent in request bodies or headers, can easily be tampered with.
Best Practices to Securely Handle Roles and Permissions
To protect your Flutter app effectively from role manipulation:
1. Encode Roles in Securely Signed Tokens (JWT Claims)
Use JWT (JSON Web Token) claims to encode user roles securely, ensuring they cannot be modified without detection:
2. Never Trust Client-Supplied Data for Authorization
Always perform server-side validation using secure tokens. Verify the JWT claims carefully to ensure the user's role matches the privileges required to access the requested functionality:
3. Maintain Roles in Secure Internal Databases
Always maintain roles and permissions internally on the server or through secure user databases, never trusting the client's submitted values. Use JWT claims merely to identify and cross-reference server-side data:
It's tempting to believe that hiding an endpoint, such as one used during testing or development, is enough to keep it secure. Developers might think, "If users can't see it, they won't find it." But in security, hiding is never enough.Imagine you've developed a Flutter-based service with a backend API that includes an internal debugging route like /beta-endpoint. Perhaps it's intended to fetch all user emails for internal testing purposes quickly. In Dart, this endpoint might initially be written without proper protection, like this:
Developers might forget or consider it safe because it doesn't appear in the app's UI. However, attackers regularly use automated tools, network analyzers, or reverse engineering techniques to uncover hidden API endpoints. Once discovered, endpoints lacking proper authentication and authorization become glaring vulnerabilities, exposing sensitive user data to unauthorized actors.Here is a good example:
Why Does This Happen? (OWASP Insight)
Developers often mistakenly rely on "security through obscurity," assuming hidden or undocumented endpoints won't be discovered.
Endpoint enumeration via automated scanning, fuzzing, or app reverse-engineering is common among attackers, quickly revealing these "hidden" routes.
Leftover endpoints from testing phases frequently remain unsecured and active, silently waiting to be exploited.
Best Practices for Securing Your API Endpoints
To ensure hidden or administrative endpoints don't compromise your app's security:
As part of your deployment process, regularly audit all API routes, identifying endpoints that aren't meant for public use.
Separate development and production environments—remove or fully disable development-only endpoints before your app reaches production.
Apply strict, role-appropriate authentication and authorization to every endpoint, regardless of its intended use or visibility.
To avoid repetition, here’s a concise recap of critical authentication and authorization practices covered earlier:
Strong Password Enforcement: Always enforce complexity and length rules server-side, with lockout mechanisms.
Secure Token Storage: Use flutter_secure_storage to store JWT tokens safely.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Implement MFA (TOTP, push notifications, biometrics) to secure critical actions.
Proper Biometric Use: Employ biometrics to unlock secure tokens; never rely solely on biometrics for sensitive data access.
Robust Session Management: Issue short-lived JWT access tokens with secure refresh tokens. Always validate JWT claims and include necessary metadata.
Apart from these, let me review a few more practical tips.
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) maps users to predefined roles (e.g., Admin, Editor, Viewer) and limits each role to specific permissions. This prevents users from stepping outside their assigned boundaries. Instead of checking individual user permissions every time, the system checks the role, and that role has known capabilities.
Define Roles. Decide what roles your application needs. Keep them minimal and purposeful (e.g., an e-commerce platform might have Customer, Seller, Admin).
Assign Permissions. Each role has a set of allowed actions, like CreateOrder, ModifyProduct, or DeleteUser.
Enforce at the Server. The server verifies the user’s role, typically from a JWT claim or a session lookup, and checks whether the requested action is permitted.
A Flutter UI can use roles to hide or show features, but the critical check remains on the server. Even if someone modifies the Flutter app to expose an admin feature, the server should reject the request if their role is not actually Admin.
Third-party authentication services like Google or Apple Sign-In offer users a seamless login experience. But convenience doesn't automatically equal security. Your backend must independently verify tokens provided by third-party services to ensure authenticity.A typical Google Sign-In integration in Flutter might look like this:
Never assume the ID token is valid just because Google issued it. Always verify the token server-side before granting access.Here’s how you might implement a token validation service in Dart using HTTP:
The "Principle of Least Privilege" is essential to secure authorization. Simply put, users should only have the minimum permissions necessary to perform their tasks—no more, no less.Consider a Flutter e-commerce app scenario where sellers manage product listings. Each seller should only manage their own items. Granting broader administrative privileges unnecessarily exposes sensitive data or functionality.Why this matters:
Excessive permissions amplify the impact if an account is compromised.
Attackers thrive in environments with broadly assigned roles.
Best practices to implement least privilege:
Clearly define roles (e.g., Admin, Editor, Seller, Viewer) and associated permissions.
Regularly audit permissions to remove unnecessary privileges.
Temporarily elevate permissions only when essential, reverting immediately afterward.
JWT role example:
Server-side enforcement
You’ve implemented secure authentication, stored tokens safely, and enforced strict role-based access on your backend. You’ve checked all the boxes. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: even with all that in place, your app can still be tampered with—at runtime—especially on rooted or jailbroken devices.This is where Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) becomes critical. Unlike static protections, RASP monitors your app’s environment in real time, detecting and responding to suspicious behavior while it is running.
Consider this scenario: You've meticulously secured your Flutter app by enforcing strong password policies, securely storing tokens, and implementing rigorous role-based access control on your backend APIs. You feel confident your app is secure.However, an attacker installs your app on a rooted device using sophisticated tools like Frida or Xposed. They can bypass local biometric authentication checks, intercept and manipulate API requests, and disable crucial security logic. Without runtime protection measures, you'd likely never detect this active manipulation, exposing sensitive user data.
freeRASP continuously scans and detects:
Rooted or jailbroken devices
Debugger attachment
Emulator usage
Binary tampering or re-signing
SSL pinning bypass attempts
Even the most substantial design-level security can fail when attackers actively tamper with your app during runtime. RASP provides a critical, proactive defense layer, monitoring your app's environment continuously. It detects threats as they occur and allows your app to react in real-time, making it significantly harder for attackers to succeed.In essence, Runtime Application Self-Protection bridges the critical gap between security by design and security in practice, giving you peace of mind that your Flutter app remains protected, no matter how sophisticated the attack.Here is a layered security model to show what are the level of check for a simple input:
Now let me introduce you a quick checklist that can help you be on top of security of your app.
[ ] Enforce strong password policies with both client- and server-side validation.
[ ] Store tokens using secure methods (e.g., flutter_secure_storage).
[ ] Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) to add extra security layers.
[ ] Validate user roles and permissions exclusively on the server.
[ ] Use runtime protection (e.g., freeRASP) to detect live threats.
[ ] Regularly audit and remove unnecessary endpoints and debugging routes.
Never rely solely on your Flutter app’s UI for access control. Assume every device is potentially compromised, validating all actions server-side and layering defenses—secure token storage, multi-factor authentication, biometrics, and passwords. Runtime protection (RASP) detects and actively responds to live threats.Securing authentication and authorization in Flutter isn't a one-time fix—it's an ongoing process. By consistently applying these best practices, you'll build apps users can trust, enabling your team to scale securely and frustrating attackers at every step.
You can also find this topic in my book and follow along in my if you prefer a more visual walkthrough.
To close this final security gap, consider integrating Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) into your Flutter app. RASP actively monitors and responds to runtime threats, significantly reducing the risk of real-time app tampering.One effective Flutter-compatible RASP solution is , which offers easy-to-integrate runtime threat detection. Here's a practical example of how simple it is to set up your Flutter project:
Majid Hajian - Azure & AI advocate, Dart & Flutter community leader, Organizer, author